From owner-cvs-all Wed Sep 5 11:15:19 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A20337B40D; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE424CE1A; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:15:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA12065; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:15:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id LAA15714; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109051815.LAA15714@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: drosih@rpi.edu Subject: Re: macro recommendation (Was ...) Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200109041705.f84H5W692572@earth.backplane.com> <20010904122843.A56085@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904233320.A34429@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904123718.A56317@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904234757.A34576@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904125125.A56758@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904140449.B75606@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042122.f84LMcm95136@earth.backplane.com> <20010904145320.A76317@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042205.f84M5YM95627@earth.backplane.com> <20010905085206.B95963@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:15:10 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2j/makemail 2.9b Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any real reason to have the SCCS IDs, given that they're derivable from the CVS IDs? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message