From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 10 20:37:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA25289 for current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 20:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw.ast.com (fw.ast.com [165.164.6.25]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA25282 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 20:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nemesis by fw.ast.com with uucp (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0tvytT-00084lC; Sun, 10 Mar 96 22:07 CST Received: by nemesis.lonestar.org (Smail3.1.27.1 #20) id m0tvymL-000BzmC; Sun, 10 Mar 96 22:00 WET Message-Id: Date: Sun, 10 Mar 96 22:00 WET To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV) Sent: Sun Mar 10 1996, 22:00:12 CST Subject: Re: New kernel Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [3]How about PASSIVE_AGGRESSIVE? The kernel doesn't actually panic, but [3]corrupts your files occasionally when you're away on vacation. :-) [3] [3] Jordan I must have that option set on this 2.1 system. Came back and there is no boot block and no partition table. Very messy. I guess you could call it "SAFEMODE". Narf, too Windows '95ish. Ok, how about "SAFECONFIG" or "PLAINCONFIG"? Frank Durda IV |"If you let it go out of focus, or uhclem%nemesis@rwsystr.nkn.net | it will become clearer." |- Tandy R&D Software Director or ...letni!rwsys!nemesis!uhclem |