From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 21:21:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C400A16A427 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane.co.uk [62.140.220.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF31F43DA9 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k26LJw4N088100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:19:58 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from localhost (jhary@localhost) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.5/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k26LJw1c088097; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:19:58 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:19:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Vince Hoffman To: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <440C961A.1060107@netfence.it> Message-ID: <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk> References: <440C961A.1060107@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vr0: rx packet lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:21:23 -0000 On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > I've just installed 6.0/AMD64 on an Asus A8V, which features a vr interface. > > I'm getting tons of "vr0: rx packet lost" kernel messages as soon as I start > transfering some files on my LAN. Needless to say, network performance is > VERY poor (ranging from 100KB/s to 1MB/s *). This may sound silly but if performance is that bad have you checked if you have a Duplex mismatch ? (one side set to full manually and the other to auto commonly results in duplex mismatches in my experience. (see http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/network/autosense.html or use google for more info) Vince > > I've looked in the archives and in bug reports and I've seen someone has > reported this too, but found no solutions. > Someone says that the same board connected to a different switch behaves > correctly. > I can only add that an identical system running 5.4/i386 does not show this > problem. > > So, getting to the questions: > _ is this a known problem? > _ was it introduced in 6.0? (And possibly would it be fixed in 6.1?) > _ is it an AMD64 only issue? If so, would I be better of starting from > scratch with i386? > _ any insight on which switches should work, which shouldn't and why? > _ any other info is welcome. > > > *) Tests indicate ~1MB/s with a generic kernel and 100-150kB/s with my custom > one, which introduces ipfw). I haven't tested thoroughly, however, so don't > take this figures seriously. > > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >