From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 29 09:52:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96901E0A for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.mail.clearhost.co.uk (smtp2.mail.clearhost.co.uk [IPv6:2001:1420::25:102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mail.clearhost.co.uk", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612401772 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:1420:a:104::1:35] (port=52028) by smtp2.mail.clearhost.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YnOet-000D4N-K4 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:51:59 +0000 Message-ID: <5540A9BF.2090003@prt.org> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:51:59 +0100 From: Paul Thornton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Frequent hickups on the networking layer References: <137094161.27589033.1430255162390.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <137094161.27589033.1430255162390.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:52:02 -0000 Hi, On 28/04/2015 22:06, Rick Macklem wrote: > ... If your > net device driver is one that allocates 9K jumbo mbufs for receive > instead of using a list of smaller mbuf clusters, I'd guess this is > what is biting you. Apologies for the thread drift, but is there a list anywhere of what drivers might have this issue? I've certainly seen performance decrease in the past between two machines with igb interfaces when the MTU was raised to use 9k frames. Paul.