Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:04:20 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Clang as default compiler
Message-ID:  <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Is there a specif PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does
> not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were
> the culprits so far)

There is no specific PR.  We have not yet placed the requirement on our
ports maintainers to deal with clang.

For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
our periodic runs.  So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't
really help us all that much.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120912060420.GE31029>