Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:04:20 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler Message-ID: <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Is there a specif PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does > not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were > the culprits so far) There is no specific PR. We have not yet placed the requirement on our ports maintainers to deal with clang. For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't really help us all that much. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120912060420.GE31029>