Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 21:04:04 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, gahr@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r317333 - in head/audio/hydrogen: . files Message-ID: <201305070404.r47444RM045548@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> of "Tue, 07 May 2013 12:46:21 %2B0930." <51887205.3080300@ShaneWare.Biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <51887205.3080300@ShaneWare.Biz>, Shane Ambler writes: > On 06/05/2013 23:07, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Can you please look at PR/177806 and either approve/disapprove the patch in > > it. If you want my opinion, I prefer to use development ports for anything > > that is not GA. IMO it's always a good idea to leave base ports as stable > > as possible. Either way, it's your decision. > > I am currently looking at 0.9.6-beta3 starting with this patch. While it > compiles fine with gcc I'll add some patches to compile with clang > before committing. I'm also changing the master site to github which is > where development happens now. > > Initially I didn't consider using the beta for the port which is why I > fixed 0.9.5 to keep the port alive. Considering that beta2 was released > 11 months ago I'm leaning towards following beta releases for this port. > > I'm guessing Pietro Cerutti has been using beta2 for a while without any > real issues? > > I'll test it a bit over the next few days and add an update, it may as > well be added to this pr. Alphas, betas, and other release development or unstable software should use -devel. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201305070404.r47444RM045548>