Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 17:32:31 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@freebsd.org> Cc: Reed Loefgren <rloefgren@forethought.net>, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe something useful, maybe not Message-ID: <BANLkTikTm_5DpckB3%2BYYsDHfgVRAyUZXhw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org> References: <4DBCD165.8090508@forethought.net> <BANLkTinvL8GEEvTaaorSJYygNeuu%2BAhE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DBD4200.2060404@gmail.com> <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 May 2011 17:27, Sahil Tandon <sahil@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:20:32 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On 5/1/11 2:34 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> "The geli utility is different than gbde" or as >> > >> > Please, no! >> > >> >> >> >> "The geli utility is different from gbde" >> > >> > Yes, that's correct. >> >> Any particular reason why this one over the previous? =A0I think the >> previous suggestion sounds more correct. > > If I may propose a revision to the entire sentence: > > "The geli utility differs from gbde in that it offers other features > and uses an alternative cryptographic scheme." > Yeah, forget my patch a minute ago, this is much better :) Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikTm_5DpckB3%2BYYsDHfgVRAyUZXhw>