From owner-cvs-all Wed Mar 14 8:35:10 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from hunkular.glarp.com (hunkular.glarp.com [199.117.25.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E9737B71A; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:35:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from huntting@hunkular.glarp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hunkular.glarp.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2EGYbT37681; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:34:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from huntting@hunkular.glarp.com) Message-Id: <200103141634.f2EGYbT37681@hunkular.glarp.com> To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: Soren Schmidt , Josef Karthauser , "[S_ren] Schmidt" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-all.h ata-disk.c ata-disk.h atapi-all.c atapi-all.h atapi-cd.c atapi-cd.h atapi-fd In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:44:47 EST." <200103141544.KAA00670@mail.virtual-estates.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:34:37 -0700 From: Brad Huntting Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Perhaps, it'd be better to have the SCSI emulation layer? Then, not only > will the existing camcontrol be able to do this job, but various > SCSI-only utilities (like CD/DVD burning software) will be able to work > with IDE devices? Or is such layer A WHOLE LOT more complex to > implement? I believe this is the method used by OpenBSD. brad To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message