From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jul  1 09:17:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA07342
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 09:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rk.ios.com (rk.ios.com [198.4.75.55])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA07337
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 09:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from rashid@localhost) by rk.ios.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09265 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:16:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rashid  Karimov <rashid@rk.ios.com>
Message-Id: <199607011616.MAA09265@rk.ios.com>
Subject: SMP supports.
To: questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:16:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

		Hi there folx,


	David most probably is tired of answering SMP related
	questions, but I'll formulate mine a bit differently:


	when will guys at freebsd.org plug extra PPro(s)
	into ftp.freebsd.org's Alder  ? :))) 


	where can we find most up-date info on SMP in
	FreeBSD ? How naturally does it go so far ? 
	Any guidelines for current kernel developers ? 
	Locking ( semaphores/mutex'es) primitives to use ?

	It looks to me that current kernel development
	goes being completely SMP-unaware, even though full
	SMP support is clearly future of FreeBSD project and
	as I understand we already have working systems.




	Rashid.