From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 19:51:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4716A404 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu) Received: from smtp-out1.berkeley.edu (smtp-out1.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.61.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB8B13C4B5 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu) Received: from adsl-75-41-56-211.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net ([75.41.56.211] helo=[192.168.42.3]) by fe6.calmail with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (auth plain:stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from ) id 1IBc2X-0003AG-K4 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:51:57 -0700 Message-ID: <469FC0DB.3040105@berkeley.edu> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:51:55 -0700 From: Steven Schlansker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <2978EDA9-D393-434C-B734-2DE188631761@berkeley.edu> <469C3900.5020703@berkeley.edu> <1c5c32890707162045u9d56cfeq2f7430ddddd55418@mail.gmail.com> <469C48F2.7000302@berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 OpenPGP: id=40BFF7A7; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Strange performance characteristics with ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:51:57 -0000 Claus Guttesen wrote: >> Aha. It corrupted data. Now I have to start the copy over again :/ >> >> This is not good! Anything else I can try? (Hopefully without making >> the process fail :-p ) > > I've only copied data between freebsd using nfs (and zfs on the > server) which worked so apparently server and client introduces some > mismacth. Have you tried both tcp and udp? Both are about the same. A recent world rebuild on the BSD machine and an update of the Linux machine improved the situation a lot, although it's still not where I like it. Detail forthcoming in the reply to the next email :)