From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 21:58:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC69B9F for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpet@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759B05E8 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (dsl-187-150-179-163-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.150.179.163] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2HLwMNr017903 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:58:23 GMT Message-ID: <51463C7C.8090405@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:58:20 -0600 From: Chris Petrik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnustep group References: <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:58:26 -0000 On 03/17/2013 03:06 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Waitman Gobble wrote .. >> Chris Petrik wrote .. >>> Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any >>> commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot >>> of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and >>> other means for gnustep ? >>> >>> Chris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> Hi, >> >> Sounds great. I'm not a committer but was looking at gnustep earlier today, have >> a need for a JBOS system and this could be good for a wall. It's an interesting >> coincidence I suppose. >> I'll check out ports status. >> > > Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. > > However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. > Here are my notes so far. > > https://dx.burplex.com/bin/gnustep.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I plan on updating gnustep and friends as well as take all gnustep related ports. However it will take a while.