From owner-freebsd-net  Sun Mar 21 23:50:58 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B4F2E14BE9; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:50:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@seidata.com)
Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)
	by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA00269;
	Mon, 22 Mar 1999 02:50:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 02:50:37 -0500 (EST)
From: <mike@seidata.com>
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>,
	Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu>,
	"'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing 
In-Reply-To: <51315.922076863@gjp.erols.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903220249100.27709-100000@ns1.seidata.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Gary Palmer wrote:

> Single Point Of Failure

Well...  I've looked at a lot of clustering technology, reverse
proxying, etc. and find it ammusing how the SPF is typically just
'shifted around' rather than eliminated.

Heh...  SPF will drive you to drinking...  Orange Juice, at least.

Later,

					-Mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message