From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 18 23:25:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CF33537B401; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 23:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A52443FB1; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 23:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04415;
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:25:00 +1000
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:24:59 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030719033531.GA79812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
Message-ID: <20030719161449.O25754@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <20030718064120.GA72366@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20030719033531.GA79812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: PR mail (was: Re: NFS ftruncate patch for review)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 06:25:05 -0000

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tim Robbins wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:38:12PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > BTW, what stopped PRs being mailed to the "normal" lists?  freebsd-bugs is
> > normal I think.
>
> The PRs are still getting mailed to freebsd-bugs. The reason you didn't see my
> patch when I replied to the PR is because Kris assigned the PR to me. The

I still feel I'm missing many of them.  I'll do a more scientific survey.

> reason followups go to the freebsd-bugs list is because, by default, the
> Responsible: field in the PR is set to freebsd-bugs. It would be better if
> Gnats would always Cc the bugs list.

I've got the feeling that the default is sometimes (and more often than it
used to be) freebsd-list-that-I'm-not-on.  Ports PRs always went to somewhere
that I didn't see.  I rather liked this.

Gnats does too good a job of sending all the administrivial mail to
freebsd-bugs, as shown by Kris recently generating more PR mail than all
commits :-).

Bruce