From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:44:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEAF16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F6343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so55492nfc for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pjo4g3I/gP7bvY6QU519NUThYmYUVB6Bw42BFIH68EYl9USHsrT0QYVCGx2hhZLdUDoZPtD2qJT/wnxGa94+/jbIWfkUsOgu+bURi3F+J1pEfMawgT+/YZiT39z8qm8lIk0agFEGxO5kDlGZdircWIS5nWLyBM8gVJY82LRySdU= Received: by 10.48.239.18 with SMTP id m18mr38225nfh; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:44:03 +0100 From: Freminlins To: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Puzzling nfs/rpc log message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:06 -0000 Hello, I have a number of FreeBSD machines mounting two NetApps via NFS. I updated one of the machines to 5.4 release. I have no prolems mounting the filers, but I am getting the following log entry every so often: Jul 27 16:36:33 fred rpcbind: connect from 192.168.1.5 to getport/addr(nlockmgr): request from unauthorized host I am only getting this for one of the filers. They are both accessed about the same amount, and are identically configured AFAIK. Can anyone shed any light on this? I've Googled a bit with no luck. Thanks, Frem.