From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 18 5:50: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mayn.de (airbus.mayn.de [194.145.150.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8103C1508D for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 05:49:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from token@wuff.mayn.de) Received: (qmail 9168 invoked from network); 18 Nov 1999 13:49:44 -0000 Received: from wuff.mayn.de (qmailr@194.145.150.17) by airbus.mayn.de with SMTP; 18 Nov 1999 13:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10259 invoked by uid 603); 18 Nov 1999 13:48:19 -0000 Message-ID: <19991118144819.B418@wuff.mayn.de> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:48:19 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow To: Gabor Zahemszky , sheldonh@uunet.co.za Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de Subject: Re: Shell References: <17696.942919296@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <199911181109.MAA29328@spike.fa.gau.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i In-Reply-To: <199911181109.MAA29328@spike.fa.gau.hu>; from Gabor Zahemszky on Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 12:09:32PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gabor Zahemszky wrote: >Well. Search my name in pdksh's ChangeLog, so believe me: >pdksh is a very good ksh88 clone, and the ksh93 is another shell, with >so many new features. True, however since on most Unix systems that ship with ksh it is still ksh88 (probably with vendor-specific bu^W fixes) it isn't that bad that the pdksh for freebsd is only a near-clone of ksh88... Btw... can we hope for BSDi ELF binary execution in the near future? mkb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message