From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 11 01:27:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FD416A405 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg [203.81.36.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5C7D43D45 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:27:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 27674 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2006 01:27:38 -0000 Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192) by smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 11 Apr 2006 01:27:37 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.122.33]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20060411012737.FPUG28656.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:27:37 +0800 Message-ID: <443B05C3.2010404@pacific.net.sg> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:26:27 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mail.matt.mcdonald@gmail.com References: <443afae3.2322cefc.28d5.ffff9366@mx.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <443afae3.2322cefc.28d5.ffff9366@mx.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, 'James S' Subject: Re: [scam: You have received a postcard !] X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:27:41 -0000 Hi, mail.matt.mcdonald@gmail.com wrote: > Is it just me or is the amount of phishing on FreeBSD lists getting to be > absurd? absurd? Because they use Windows programs on FreeBSD? Absurd? Because they all come through the filter? This will always happen as long as you do not screen every registration by hand. It might will be helpful if there would be system where members of the list can report abuse cases and the system automatically blocks the address. But there would be then the need for an administrator to unblock if something went wrong. Erich