From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 10 08:41:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EF716A4B3
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pilchuck.reedmedia.net (pilchuck.reedmedia.net [209.166.74.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F1F43F3F
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from reed@reedmedia.net)
Received: from reed by pilchuck.reedmedia.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1
	(Debian))	id 1A7zO2-0004kG-00; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:41:02 -0700
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
In-Reply-To: <16262.43787.941530.439241@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0310100838300.3379-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
cc: netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: CNET: amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:41:28 -0000

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Dan Pelleg wrote:

> The following quote is from http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-5089274.html
> (currently linked from the front page):
>
> "Sun Microsystems' Solaris will become the third operating system to take
> advantage of Advanced Micro Devices' 64-bit Opteron processor."
>
> With the other two being Linux and Microsoft Windows. Besides mailing the
> author and pointing out his error, does it make sense for someone (the
> FreeBSD Foundation?) to issue a press release regarding Opteron support?

If anyone follows up to CNET, be sure to mention NetBSD too.

 http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/2003/05/News81.html

 http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_5730~32703,00.html

 http://www.wasabisystems.com/news/pr20020625.html

 http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/amd64/

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/