From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:47:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993716A4B3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A459B43FA3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:47:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richardcoleman@mindspring.com) Received: from c-24-98-233-138.atl.client2.attbi.com ([24.98.233.138] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19z4wS-0001P2-00 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:47:44 -0700 Message-ID: <3F666BCE.6080203@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:47:58 -0400 From: Richard Coleman Organization: Critical Magic, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20030915105356.GA11926@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 1ee258965991efcb0865379cdb43356e5e89bb4777695beb702e37df12b9c9efbb4004c4bb6e170c86b75c40c3ba62f4350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: A new sort utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:47:46 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote: > >> Comments/patches are welcome. As the "History" suggestion >> of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to >> FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools. > > Might we put this in freebsd-current (5.x), but under some > other name? sortbsd, or something? Why would you want to do that? Unless the performance difference is huge, I don't see the problem. Since the number of people that really that extra 10% (or whatever) of speed (for sort) is small, I would suggest the reverse. Replace the current sort with the BSD licensed version, and move the current one to a port "gnu-sort", or whatever. I suddenly feel the need to go build a bikeshed. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com