From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 10 07:11:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA6A1065677;
	Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3538FC0A;
	Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3192860lag.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:11:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=qp2jfuOGbQOf2eYJYqFw/kbD/GwcnHB0cuUgTRe1de0=;
	b=PZ3U3lR9JQ+Auu9SrgISt7Hq1QYQFFNKV1kPZQXO0aHVFlPGM3BK2JoBQcsKqepmBX
	2s5o1qN57UjCquJMB4l3le0dQ2cWgg9k80+yQKYaBWyde0bhT3RhRPBS842OVtrYgXsV
	jetqjYjyn+vLg4M1fBdC4tdHAPuwt7Y7pQXJISKe8P36+IfHRK+5YhVN0XJrb/u75v3o
	wJgnIiL4ZLkFY1N7Yg6TqlZOLS0XKu0wO728Mo5I+5GYOvf3C/VGV50/PaWN/WcdvaJk
	QRQ/hWKEiBswM38b4JYUIAvODl8K8tjD+czyVo79WfkeGzuS0a7IeHIud4C3JNWqhFGM
	+L1Q==
Received: by 10.152.109.99 with SMTP id hr3mr3588930lab.33.1331361703330; Fri,
	09 Mar 2012 22:41:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.99.101 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 22:41:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120309153952.Horde.n8gTQpjmRSRPWhY4YaaoHcA@webmail.leidinger.net>
References: <1331226987.9802.19.camel@work>
	<20120309134425.Horde.RIrSbJjmRSRPWfspeJi2piA@webmail.leidinger.net>
	<20120309134433.GX23354@e-new.0x20.net>
	<20120309153952.Horde.n8gTQpjmRSRPWhY4YaaoHcA@webmail.leidinger.net>
From: Svyatoslav Lempert <svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:41:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAERaTk9Ck4infypMnWuKWGU9rgmBwJqhv4tTv2yOBJP1NaztfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org,
	Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:11:47 -0000

>>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
>>> > eagle)
>>> >
>>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need
>>> > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14
>>> > version.
>>> >
>>> > Are there plans to update linux_base-f10 sometime this year ?
>>>
>>> Those which have the knowledge to produce a more recent linux_base
>>> port, don't seem to have the time to do this. Those which tell to have
>>> time and express interest to do this, seem to lose interest or time
>>> when they get get aware of what needs to be done (see
>>>

We can not run last Fedora 16 on FreeBSD - this is not possible,
because Linux emulation is kernel 2.6.16 and Fedora needs in > 2.6.32
kernel ABI.

I try this in FreeBSD 8.2 (I did a "draft of the port")

# ./bash
FATAL: kernel too old

# file bash
bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped

# sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32
compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.6.32

# ./bash
Segmentation fault

I think it should be apply to the CoreTeam

What do you think about the CentOS? It may be more optimal to look on
CentOS 6 userland port?

-- 
Svyatoslav