Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:43:31 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> To: Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression Message-ID: <20060515123801.B36421@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <4465843E.9070108@alumni.rice.edu> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <4465843E.9070108@alumni.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! On Sat, 13 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote: > Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html. Thanks for suggestion. I've just tried it, performance difference is indistinguishable. > Also, use the link0 option with your fxp cards if they support it. See > the fxp(4) man page for more info. Here is an example /etc/rc.conf entry: > ifconfig_fxp0="inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx link0" Well, I'm aware of this feature. I'm just evaluating performance of RELENG_6 systems on uniprocessor i386 system, and (for now) it's significantly worse than under RELENG_4. So I've used fxp just for comparison (and to rule out possible specific regression in rl NIC driver), not for anything more serious. > Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060515123801.B36421>