From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Oct  3  5:11:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D64837B405
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Oct 2001 05:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from k7.mavetju.org (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141])
	by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B39B2B709; Wed,  3 Oct 2001 14:11:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by k7.mavetju.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 6BA2C294; Wed,  3 Oct 2001 22:11:14 +1000 (EST)
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:11:14 +1000
From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To: Noor Dawod <noor@comrax.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Question about two NIC's
Message-ID: <20011003221114.H563@k7.mavetju.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>,
	Noor Dawod <noor@comrax.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <20011003214855.C559@k7.mavetju.org> <PHEBIOJOBJJLIIJCOINKOEDEEEAA.noor@comrax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <PHEBIOJOBJJLIIJCOINKOEDEEEAA.noor@comrax.com>; from noor@comrax.com on Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:59:47PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:59:47PM +0200, Noor Dawod wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. If you could further help me, I'd be greatful.
> Although both NIC's appear to be UP, I cannot send a ping on one
> network. Observe our network:
> 
> fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 194.90.246.124 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 194.90.246.255
>         ether 00:d0:b7:b6:0e:2e
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>         status: active
> xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 172.22.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.22.1.255
>         ether 00:10:5a:a5:a5:62
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>         status: active
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
>         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> 
> As you can see, xl0 is connected to an Intranet network (a dummy network
> used for backup). When trying to ping two IP's, look what happens:
> 
> (pinging a true IP in the Internet)
> PING 194.90.1.5 (194.90.1.5): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=0.923 ms
> 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=0.411 ms
> 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=1.042 ms
> 
> (ping an IP in the 172.22.1.x space)
> PING 172.22.1.1 (172.22.1.1): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendto: Permission denied
> ping: sendto: Permission denied
> ping: sendto: Permission denied

This message looks like there is something wrong with your firewall
rules regarding the xl0 interface. If "netstat -rn" show that 172.22
should go to xl0 then there is nothing wrong with the routing-table.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis   |              Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org
edwin@mavetju.org |           Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions:
------------------+                       http://www.FatalDimensions.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message