From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jul 13 16:05:39 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA27786
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jul 1996 16:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from twwells.com (twwells.com [199.79.159.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA27779
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 1996 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by twwells.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #8)
	id m0ufDke-0001C1C; Sat, 13 Jul 96 19:05 EDT
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Subject: rsh problem, 2.1-STABLE
Date: 13 Jul 1996 19:05:24 -0400
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4s9a3k$qk8@twwells.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: twwells.com
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Here's an output, somewhat shrunk:

admin@admin: sh -x dodump
+ rsh -n -l root admin /root/bin/make-archive / . -print0
+ dd bs=32k of=/dev/nrst0
+ rsh -n -l root admin /root/bin/make-archive /usr . -print0
+ dd bs=32k of=/dev/nrst0
admin.cyberenet.net: Connection refused
+ rsh -n -l root admin /root/bin/make-archive /usr2 . -print0
+ dd bs=32k of=/dev/nrst0

Note the `connection refused' after the second rsh. This occured
on both the runs of this I attempted. Yes, you read it correctly;
I am doing an rsh from admin to admin. It's a sleazy way to avoid
having to write setuid scripts. :-)

So, anyway, what's with this `connection refused'? This is a very
lightly loaded machine, so I don't think it's kernel resource
exhaustion.