From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 10 09:47:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB828AC; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41B74186C; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc28-cmbg15-2-0-cust64.5-4.cable.virginm.net [86.27.189.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1A9lM5Z000410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:47:24 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r343559 - head/net-p2p/litecoin From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20140210075232.GU80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:47:17 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201402092329.s19NTHiq089517@svn.freebsd.org> <20140210011718.GA79272@mouf.net> <20140210075232.GU80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Steve Wills , svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, John Marino , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:47:28 -0000 On 10 Feb 2014, at 07:52, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I do not think that requires an approval, as for FreeBSD this change = is no-op, > It is also no intrusive and just "fixes" building of that port for = Dragonfly. Relying on OPSYS and OSVERSION is pretty horrible and doesn't scale. = Already we have problems with convoluted OSVERSION expressions that are = hard to understand and really mean 'fix for PR12345 has been merged to = the relevant branch'. It would be far better to centralise these into a = single file for each platform, listing features / bugfixes / needed = work-arounds and start removing explicit OSVERSION checks from any other = Makefiles. If supporting Dragonfly is one of our objectives, then I'd = strongly encourage the people who are working on it to engage in this = kind of cleanup, rather than piling more hacks into the tree. David