Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:26:42 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages Message-ID: <E05DC188-FDB3-4FA3-8931-4E6B335C07C9@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120319213508.GA1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320091935.GF1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Mar 2012, at 10:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> i386-32 and amd64-64 is weird and confusing.
>=20
> IMO, you should go either with x86-{32,64} names, or with i386/amd64,
> not with a mix.
Would we ever want to support something like x32 from Linux (which might =
be amd64-32)?
http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2011/ocw/sessions/531
--=20
Bruce Cran=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E05DC188-FDB3-4FA3-8931-4E6B335C07C9>