From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 18 17:20:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F7316A423 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DD343D48 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5C31758E; Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:20:52 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:20:52 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name Message-ID: <20060318192052.6ca31fe0@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <441AC7BB.4050701@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> References: <441A27F4.8010404@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> <20060317092406.490e7708@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <441AC7BB.4050701@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.15; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: dspam-devel-3.6.4.20060315.1518 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:20:54 -0000 [ ports@ cc'ed back ] On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:29:15 +0100 "Daniel S. Haischt" wrote: > Hello, > > Ion-Mihai Tetcu schrieb: > > > > > > Please don't use BDB; I'm tempted to drop support for BDB completely > > Use SQLite (yes, I raed the other mail) or HASH if you don't want a > > full SQL server. > > I was going to build various DSPAM packages for pfSense, each > using a different DB provider. Tho, yes I did read that BDB is > not 'recomanded' :) Why not build a single package and relay on dspam.conf database back-end selection ? That the reason we now have the possibility to use shared libs for the DB. > > This being said, uname -a ? Didn't work means exactly what ? > > Please do a 'make rmconfig; make -DBATCH' and tell me if you still got > > problems (in which case I'd be inclined to say you might have a local > > problem). > > > > Didn't work means that the DSPAM configure script did refuse to > take 'libdb41_drv' as an input param for the DB provider knob. I don't know what is the difference between 6.0R and 6.0-STABLE regarding BDB and I don't have any 6.0R to play on. As you know, we guarantee -RELEASE to work only with ports tagged for that release and nothing more. > Using libdb4_drv finally did work out. Could you please provide me with a patch that would make your changes depend on OSVERSION for 6.0 RELEASE ? So I could include them in the port. > > To fix the SQLite issue, I changed the LDFLAGS variable from > > LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" > > to > > LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib -L/usr/lib -lpthread" > > After having done a 'make rmconfig && make config' the issue > did disappear. With the LDFLAGS above or without ? Thanks, -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" It is more rational to sacrifice one life than six. -- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3