From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 28 09:04:05 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 73F1016A4CE; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:04:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fafoe.narf.at (chello213047085026.6.14.vie.surfer.at
	[213.47.85.26])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC66343D2F; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:04:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at (wombat.fafoe.narf.at [192.168.1.42])
	by fafoe.narf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE193FA7;
	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:04:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id C101FE3; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:03:58 +0200
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org>
To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20050428090356.GB67414@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
References: <200504220830.j3M8UXSC030662@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050422084616.GB87979@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
	<20050423132715.GA59057@VARK.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050423132715.GA59057@VARK.MIT.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/src s_ceill.c s_floorl.c s_truncl.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:04:05 -0000

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:27:15AM -0400, David Schultz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> 
> > Please ignore my last message, I'll just use double addition to generate
> > the exception.
> 
> Couldn't that result in a spurious underflow when logn double x gets
> converted to double precision?  Consider x = 0x1p-2000L.

Indeed, that does happen.  Should I back out the last change and leave
it broken on sparc64 until someone fixes the quad emulation?

Stefan