From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 10 13:28:49 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C54DD5
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C521DB6
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4ADSmfk041429
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:48 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: mmoll@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mmoll@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-199820-13-8YRqPq6qkm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:49 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199820

Michael Moll <mmoll@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |mmoll@freebsd.org
                   |org                         |
                 CC|                            |mmoll@freebsd.org
             Status|New                         |Open

--- Comment #10 from Michael Moll <mmoll@freebsd.org> ---
John, the approach of packaging Rubygems in general, and especially Rails
specific ones was always a controvese topic. Personally I always want
everything OS packaged, that's why I'm putting energy into porting gems anyway.

In regard to the general usefulness: except a few GitLab specific ones, it
potentially helps other applications to get packaged also, especially newer
versions of Jekyll or Redmine.

In regard to a potential GitLab port: We're trying it the second time now,
personally I think it would be better to target 7.11 (instead of 7.10 now) as
everything is more tedious than expected. However, it will be a lot less work
to do when all the dependent gems for 7.10 are getting in now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.