Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:28:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline Message-ID: <bug-199820-13-8YRqPq6qkm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199820 Michael Moll <mmoll@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |mmoll@freebsd.org |org | CC| |mmoll@freebsd.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #10 from Michael Moll <mmoll@freebsd.org> --- John, the approach of packaging Rubygems in general, and especially Rails specific ones was always a controvese topic. Personally I always want everything OS packaged, that's why I'm putting energy into porting gems anyway. In regard to the general usefulness: except a few GitLab specific ones, it potentially helps other applications to get packaged also, especially newer versions of Jekyll or Redmine. In regard to a potential GitLab port: We're trying it the second time now, personally I think it would be better to target 7.11 (instead of 7.10 now) as everything is more tedious than expected. However, it will be a lot less work to do when all the dependent gems for 7.10 are getting in now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199820-13-8YRqPq6qkm>