From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 18:13:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B931065863; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815FB8FC12; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27CEC46B0C; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34DC58A009; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:42 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:50:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100819; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20101004123725.65d09b9e.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <20101005153926.88b4c1e1.daichi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101005153926.88b4c1e1.daichi@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010111150.00785.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Daichi GOTO , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:44 -0000 On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:39:26 am Daichi GOTO wrote: > Next step discussion engaged from this research I guess. > > Should we do change FreeBSD's fcntl(2) to return correct l_pid > when called with F_SETLK? Or keep current behavior?? > I want to hear other developers ideas and suggetions. POSIX doesn't say that F_SETLK returns a valid l_pid, so I think FreeBSD's current behavior is fine. -- John Baldwin