From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 11 10:44:22 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 48A2716A4C0; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AEB8243FDD; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8BHiHjR047825;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net)
Received: (from marcel@localhost)
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8BHiHY7047824;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:44:17 -0700
From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20030911174417.GB47739@ns1.xcllnt.net>
References: <200309110014.h8B0EHOX044603@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<xzpisnz68d0.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpisnz68d0.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.sparc64 ttys
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:44:22 -0000

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:24:11AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >   Log:
> >   Changed the ttyd entries to ttyu, which correspond to the device nodes
> >   created by uart(4).
> 
> Is there a good reason for uart to use ttyu instead of ttyd?  There's
> no risk of conflict even if both uart and sio are present, thanks to
> devfs, so why not use the traditional name?

The uart(4) driver creates a device node with its minor device
number. This number is unique within a device class only.

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net