From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 15:53:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CFA16A419 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF313C44B for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from cust16202.lava.net ([64.65.95.74] helo=[192.168.0.101]) by rip.psg.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IZTmF-000PWo-QR; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:53:48 +0000 Message-ID: <46F68BFC.7030800@psg.com> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:53:32 -1000 From: Randy Bush User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Hermansson References: <46F5FF0A.7030203@psg.com> <46F68B1C.6020303@chdevelopment.se> In-Reply-To: <46F68B1C.6020303@chdevelopment.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nat and ipfw - divert or builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:53:49 -0000 > I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would > choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network > that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated > variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use. and one less daemon. less code is better code. i will likely give it a try. thanks. randy