From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:07:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EF410657A0; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ECF8FC23; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id n0EH7hIV020729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:07:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <496E1BDF.5060106@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:07:43 -0800 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <47325.1231952677@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <47325.1231952677@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: svn commit: r187162 - head/usr.sbin/usbconfig X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:07:50 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <496E18B1.5020501@freebsd.org>, Sam Leffler writes: > > >> That's fine. My point was that when running the new usb stack usbdevs >> does this: >> >> trouble% usbdevs >> trouble% usbdevs -v >> usbdevs: no USB controllers found >> > > Couldn't it just say: > > New USB stack found, check usbconfig(8) man-page. > > Adding backwards command line compatibility sounds silly... > > I don't agree. I'll look into it. Sam