From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 17 20:48:52 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3AD106568B;
	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from unixmania@gmail.com)
Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.191])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2388FC21;
	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:48:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p33so129472gvf.39
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:48:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=jYIrwbgCxPmMQYVrW2ROpCDwRgbyxe1WvasN8FhejIo=;
	b=gjlUcp2oNGiIP7gerTRjtdwAOUEE48ULte8aqiZ3WE5BRsnuZVbSXLZWqhDTjHo3k1
	laMjoZVp4hBbD9Y8nb59TTzlGccUsIo2/oS7C7drHCzziUFVqmIoVDXPz0X4xAxc7ADj
	LrizD8vm40XyfF9hq3Bp3E23PbvDkDIubjT+M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=RUZKY/B3zY5BwE3Ioe6eRXlvRHYeNsaZ2m7jQASqlVF5/Nn1vnuzFFUoXZo1y5NPGy
	YQ03h+ICCrlGjXj3jFuJUaQ5zEuFRFv4tiezIsRZCUTph9rVJ54Wb+5KIM5BoVfal2jJ
	qNUqKQMjGARj0EQsg4TSf5qCLH02fyCCWVG5E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.168.153 with SMTP id k25mr1037438hbe.68.1258489355704; 
	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:22:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1258477653.2303.48.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
References: <200911170210.nAH2A3B2089193@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<1258477653.2303.48.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:22:35 -0200
Message-ID: <e71790db0911171222s36b7e414gc0d1e9b0bd2cff64@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>
To: Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/137373: x11/libX11: make dependance on x11/libxcb
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:48:52 -0000

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 02:10 +0000, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>> The following reply was made to PR ports/137373; it has been noted by GN=
ATS.
>>
>> From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>
>> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: ports/137373: x11/libX11: make dependance on x11/libxcb
>> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:07:47 -0200
>>
>> =A0This PR has been collecting dust for three moths. Is there any chance
>> =A0that the proposed patch gets committed?
>
> There is a pretty fair risk of breaking several other ports with this.
> Other ports that also expect xcb to be present would need to be modified
> to either have xcb disabled or fail if libX11 does not have the needed
> functionality.

That's exactly why I made it optional, default on, keeping the default beha=
vior.

--=20
My preferred quotation of Robert Louis Stevenson is "You cannot
make an omelette without breaking eggs". Not because I like the
omelettes, but because I like the sound of eggs being broken.