Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:50:19 -0600 From: Ed Stover <estover@nativenerds.com> To: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: Jon Falconer <jfalconer@puc.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two default routes Message-ID: <42DED52B.9020603@nativenerds.com> In-Reply-To: <200507181810.44042@harrymail> References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10507172011550.283-100000@ecf.puc.edu> <200507181810.44042@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Montag, 18. Juli 2005 05:25 CEST schrieb Jon Falconer: > >>I have two ISP connections, a 45Mb and a 6Mb. Depending on what block of >>local addresses a packet is coming from will determine which ISP I want >>to send the packet out. In essence the default route used for a packet >>depends on its source address (for traffic leaving our campus.) Can >>someone tell me what package I should read up on (ip,ipf,ipfw,other)? or > > > See IPFWs fwd or PFs route-to and reply-to. > > -Harry > > >>if I should just do this with a real router and not FreeBSD? >> >>Thanks for your insights, >> >>Jon >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I am an ipfw advocate but I have seen a number of different people do this with OPENBSD's pf on FreeBSD. Google it try "load balance pf freebsd".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42DED52B.9020603>