From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 4 23:28:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571EBC2C; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1:2300:1001:1001:1001:face]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6102E4E; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (c-71-224-221-174.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B328889A; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:28:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 0B328889A Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 19:28:00 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: svn error during 'make buildkernel'? Message-ID: <20130804232800.GJ2352@glenbarber.us> References: <20130803210348.GA715@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130803210858.GJ78299@glenbarber.us> <20130803213023.GA812@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130803214313.GL78299@glenbarber.us> <20130804232358.GA6068@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130804232358.GA6068@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 23:28:03 -0000 --ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 04:23:58PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > Here's a perfect example why chasing the bleeding edge ports > is a stupid idea. After upgrading devel/subversion as you > suggested, I see >=20 They are not "bleeding edge ports", they are updates to ported software. > cd /usr/ports > % svn upgrade > % svn update > Updating '.': > svn: E170000: Unrecognized URL scheme for 'http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/h= ead' Did you enable the SERF option? If not, then clearly adding an UPDATING entry is pointless anyway, since you did not read the ports/UPDATING entry 20130619. Glen --ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR/uOAAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj+7wH/2SdridbMweqNkgUz2/2MGMB anyZYHNs3KKFwqEvRAxg3nwCZIbM1UYHCZGYVmirqU+2L6poHD3OazO3HZFx/Hsj cfGGtem5spAuyp2z4YXHJMV48ScVoxJTqIOw4nMyU/hCVwo+ITsCJgbiupOBrUs5 CMbyXBXsftMFgQp5wGaXVS9rJOhUdKR0soqqCEt9RPbhmpNoT9034Ia8cNrTIjUi jkyPTvIItRZcyA5wd2+TySQOD05S/3AxZaNM2hp3Kpf13oT/2K5+l5xUr5cP6DCI Pi6xoD36pY/zHBy7Jy+cR6ZcZksdQnNmV13BhhdbOxlMgX8ERvBGiCCOEYokSgI= =Mp3y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm--