From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 08:27:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8B516A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc5.i.0x5.de (n.0x5.de [213.146.113.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D7443D3F for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 08:27:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicolas@pc5.i.0x5.de) Received: from pc5.i.0x5.de (nicolas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pc5.i.0x5.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4OFQd8H012708; Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nicolas@pc5.i.0x5.de) Received: (from nicolas@localhost) by pc5.i.0x5.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i4OFQdFs012707; Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nicolas) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:39 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040524152639.GA12607@pc5.i.0x5.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: C11ABC0E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 19DB 8392 8FE0 814A 7362 EEBD A53B 526A C11A BC0E X-PGP-Key: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/nicolas_rachinsky.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:27:16 -0000 * Garance A Drosihn [2004-05-24 00:07 -0400]: > The third proposal is basically: > a) move most "standard" files into a new pkg-data > file, as described in previous proposals, except > for pkg-descr and "patch" files. > b) create a new directory at the root directory of > the ports collection. That directory would be > called "Patches", and inside would be a directory > for each category. Inside each Patches/category > directory would be a single-file for each port > in that category, where that single-file would > have all the "ports-collection patches" for the > matching port. I hoep I haven't missed something obvious, but what about local patches and Makefile.local? Will they continue to work? Nicolas