From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 7 9:40:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADF91570A for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:40:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA11758; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:40:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200001071740.JAA11758@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th In-Reply-To: from "torstenb@FreeBSD.ORG" at "Jan 7, 2000 01:48:17 pm" To: torstenb@vmunix.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:40:34 -0800 (PST) Cc: patrick@mindstep.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ... > > I strongly suggest to not release 4.0 till the IPv6 import has been finished. > Beside the need for IPv6 it would be wrong to ship a release with a half- > complete implementation. I expect every person that has made similiar statements here and bore all the developers with the additional workload of reading them to download 4.0-current, enable INETV6 and start applying every patch that the KAME group posts to the -committers list and have complete review feedback within 48 hours of such patches being posted. If you, the users, are not ready to do this, STOP asking those to be the folks so described: ``We the willing have been doing so much with so little for so long that we are now qualified to do anything with absolutely nothing at all''. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message