Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:30 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port Message-ID: <200511090742.34222.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wednesday 09 November 2005 02:50 am, George Katsanos wrote: > is there any way [or do you know the exact port] that will save me from > installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of kde stuff [which I hate] > at my computer? No. The reason is that Konqueror *is* KDE in a very real sense. It has very little functionality on its own, but instead uses parts of other packages to do all its work. Even such "minor" things as fetching files via HTTP are farmed out to KIO-slaves from other packages. Konqueror is probably more likely than any other KDE program to have an enormous number of dependencies. That's by design and not really something that could be stripped down. -- Kirk Strauser [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDcfzK5sRg+Y0CpvERAik2AJ47vroQa82ZpKVt1wSFgEYxc3VVpQCfeXpK n4qoyYyjKG1ycxU402ZEwoU= =umsC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511090742.34222.kirk>