From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 20:00:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4647F106564A for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108398FC0C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q88K083C091173 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:00:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q88K08EH091159; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:00:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:00:08 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201209082000.q88K08EH091159@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, BHaRMWjAQZbLiIxEGW Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C78B1065670 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B468FC0C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q88Jolxv067900 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:50:47 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q88JolpO067887; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:50:47 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201209081950.q88JolpO067887@red.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:50:47 GMT From: BHaRMWjAQZbLiIxEGW To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: misc/171472: wAWpnQHZwqiRe X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:00:09 -0000 >Number: 171472 >Category: misc >Synopsis: wAWpnQHZwqiRe >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Sep 08 20:00:08 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: BHaRMWjAQZbLiIxEGW >Release: lmqDgzpxUG >Organization: FVTKGVbOsO >Environment: Thanks Matt. My setup Freebsd on thumb drive (no swap file) only the 1GB memory that the sveerr ships with, 4 disks 250gb in DL320s. I was getting around 300 1000 IOPS in sequential workload with large files works out to be between 50 80 MB/s. (RAIDZ1 Stripped)Currently I am presenting each drive as a raid 0 volume to OS (Smart array ). da0/da1/da2/da3. I have tested replacement and rebuild, this works well. Only thing I have noticed is it takes the defined space of the volume, so replacing 250gb with 400gb only saw 250gb. I might have to install the HP CLI management package, delete the volume and create a new one. Since ZFS can dynamically grow on larger disks.Currently my interests are:- Performance. (what are the limitation of DL320s backend)- The DL320s has two internal thumb drive slots. Is it possible.- Issues related to lack of swap file. (I believe zfs caches within Kernel space, and this shouldn't be swapping)- Failure (Disk / Smart Array).Hope you can spare some thoughts Thanks for your time again. >Description: Thanks Matt. My setup Freebsd on thumb drive (no swap file) only the 1GB memory that the sveerr ships with, 4 disks 250gb in DL320s. I was getting around 300 1000 IOPS in sequential workload with large files works out to be between 50 80 MB/s. (RAIDZ1 Stripped)Currently I am presenting each drive as a raid 0 volume to OS (Smart array ). da0/da1/da2/da3. I have tested replacement and rebuild, this works well. Only thing I have noticed is it takes the defined space of the volume, so replacing 250gb with 400gb only saw 250gb. I might have to install the HP CLI management package, delete the volume and create a new one. Since ZFS can dynamically grow on larger disks.Currently my interests are:- Performance. (what are the limitation of DL320s backend)- The DL320s has two internal thumb drive slots. Is it possible.- Issues related to lack of swap file. (I believe zfs caches within Kernel space, and this shouldn't be swapping)- Failure (Disk / Smart Array).Hope you can spare some thoughts Thanks for your time again. >How-To-Repeat: Thanks Matt. My setup Freebsd on thumb drive (no swap file) only the 1GB memory that the sveerr ships with, 4 disks 250gb in DL320s. I was getting around 300 1000 IOPS in sequential workload with large files works out to be between 50 80 MB/s. (RAIDZ1 Stripped)Currently I am presenting each drive as a raid 0 volume to OS (Smart array ). da0/da1/da2/da3. I have tested replacement and rebuild, this works well. Only thing I have noticed is it takes the defined space of the volume, so replacing 250gb with 400gb only saw 250gb. I might have to install the HP CLI management package, delete the volume and create a new one. Since ZFS can dynamically grow on larger disks.Currently my interests are:- Performance. (what are the limitation of DL320s backend)- The DL320s has two internal thumb drive slots. Is it possible.- Issues related to lack of swap file. (I believe zfs caches within Kernel space, and this shouldn't be swapping)- Failure (Disk / Smart Array).Hope you can spare some thoughts Thanks for your time again. >Fix: Thanks Matt. My setup Freebsd on thumb drive (no swap file) only the 1GB memory that the sveerr ships with, 4 disks 250gb in DL320s. I was getting around 300 1000 IOPS in sequential workload with large files works out to be between 50 80 MB/s. (RAIDZ1 Stripped)Currently I am presenting each drive as a raid 0 volume to OS (Smart array ). da0/da1/da2/da3. I have tested replacement and rebuild, this works well. Only thing I have noticed is it takes the defined space of the volume, so replacing 250gb with 400gb only saw 250gb. I might have to install the HP CLI management package, delete the volume and create a new one. Since ZFS can dynamically grow on larger disks.Currently my interests are:- Performance. (what are the limitation of DL320s backend)- The DL320s has two internal thumb drive slots. Is it possible.- Issues related to lack of swap file. (I believe zfs caches within Kernel space, and this shouldn't be swapping)- Failure (Disk / Smart Array).Hope you can spare some thoughts Thanks for your time again. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: