From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 21 22:45:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECBE16A477 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from maru.leela.ws (209-193-28-35-cdsl-rb1.jnu.acsalaska.net [209.193.28.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B58013C4F0 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.249] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by maru.leela.ws (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2LMjdlh012779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:41 GMT (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <4601B593.7050007@mac.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:45:39 -0800 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeffrey Goldberg References: <0EE4A357-FB1C-410D-BDF2-AF3A8BC7736B@goldmark.org> <20070319143905.7c69cc41@gumby.homeunix.com> <823E470A-93A8-4B6B-899A-E337FB75CABD@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <823E470A-93A8-4B6B-899A-E337FB75CABD@goldmark.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Summary: Tell portupgrade to use passive ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:43 -0000 On 2007/03/21 14:29, Jeffrey Goldberg seems to have typed: > > As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to > exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but > that isn't enough to justify its continued use. > > > Of course having recently displayed my ignorance of how these > things work, > I'm in no position to make such proclamations. > > Two reasons: 1) FTP supports "resume" for a partial download 2) HTTP has a tendency to timeout on large files unless your httpd.conf sets an unreasonably long timeout.