From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 19:18:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6B016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:18:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524FF43D2F for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@noogenesis.org) Received: from [68.84.181.60] (pcp02693964pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net[68.84.181.60]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005032819184301400jc9jre>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:18:43 +0000 Message-ID: <42485893.9050302@noogenesis.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:18:43 -0500 From: Derek VerLee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050122) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <42472079.5090101@noogenesis.org> <20050328055931.GA13785@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050328055931.GA13785@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.4Pre sched_ule SMP XOrg hangs or reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:18:45 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:07:05PM -0500, Derek VerLee wrote: > > >>Hi, i have become fascinated with getting sched_ule to run reliably, and >>I've been running tests with about 8 different configurations. I've >>listed some of them and the results at my website, at >>http://noogenesis/freebsd/testing_ule, the index html for which I've >>also attached to this email. I have not yet succeeded in getting a core >>dump from the kernel, any advice on coaxing a kernel panic instead of a >>hang so that a core dump can be obtained, let me know. >> >> > >Unfortunately ULE is known to still be broken. This isn't likely to >be fixed before 5.4-RELEASE. > >Kris > I am actually aware of this. I just thought my testing might be helpful to someone. Probably "everyone" is tied up with getting things together for 5.4 release, I guess. But nobody cares about sched_ule right now? What about later? Should I forward to -hackers or -current? Not to waste anymore of anyone's time or bandwidth. Its just that I am having fun using this as excuse to learn about the inner workings of the freebsd kernel. ( Its a bit bigger but oh so much more well written then NACHOS.. heh =P ) _derek