Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:23:08 +0200 From: Adriaan de Groot <adridg@freebsd.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r514669 - in head: . Mk/Uses archivers/kf5-karchive devel/kf5-extra-cmake-modules devel/kf5-kapidox devel/kf5-kauth devel/kf5-kbookmarks devel/kf5-kcmutils devel/kf5-kconfig devel/kf5-k... Message-ID: <1800249.u6MfGjpqfb@beastie.bionicmutton.org> In-Reply-To: <20191020233557.GA4508@lonesome.com> References: <201910171806.x9HI6g9e044915@repo.freebsd.org> <20191020233557.GA4508@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2932613.0P3pStmDMi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Monday, 21 October 2019 01:35:58 CEST Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 06:06:42PM +0000, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > This release is part of a series of planned monthly releases making > > improvements available to developers in a quick and predictable manner. > > Ouch. I know it's probably impossible to ask this, but ... is there > any way we can limit the rate of change here? e.g. by -devel ports > or something similar? KDE Frameworks releases monthly (for the past 63 months), Plasma quarterly and Applications semi-anually. I appreciate that that's a lot of building (just the KDE stack, so not a full run of everything depending on those, is an overnight job on 12-STABLE amd64). Putting in a -devel version could slow the Frameworks releases to the rate of Plasma releases, but it'd be a lot of weird churn on our end (copying -devel over the non-devel versions every few months). I don't think that's really doable from a port-maintainer perspective. Is there a way we (kde@) can reduce the amount of Power9 gotchas that end up on your plate? Piotr Kubaj is all over the tree and has been helpful in our ports, but I think he has access to real hardware. If there's a simple "press play" thing I can do to prevent issues reaching you (that would include a PPC jail, although I expect then that it'd be a week's compile on my local workstation), then I'd be happy to put a little extra effort in there. [ade] --nextPart2932613.0P3pStmDMi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEUq+pvuD+N8/vVW++WoDe9T7W/7IFAl2tsTwACgkQWoDe9T7W /7Kf7w//ezzUQnUH013Hi7yyqoSPHkkpLS8JjpwT8mqZEnuMHLP2B/KsN5LqnIM0 rd2L3GYu1TlgxAwjNuJCUW6yAvpjNmUzGvZW5PCjWk5+V524O7aMzQVp0FhHFmcT iCORz8giIXjOiRwGS6ZkexWSfgOqBD1z62UBgNlwPosPvwUpMkCYqUFbKphM8Xoq BHIe77ASPUgNQrUHD1Wd26MV2RT9O3azgOPtx6XDd9ySVduCzcZZOG3kAMkU0f61 M2KCTzn3pNlQg4xY/0gbvKBp2nlC4Be3sMmKCnN7IaF5rp7yVXpBjIWTw4rqKMXU QcJW4JRL89R5KOnlnyipgPEZqF2+zIBtkr6X9k/yD+kojcfX7uahLK/pB55PSDBT 1RT86LZg67QhgoRlaQkY6BQWNLlfy7EE/jCWArh6sScqpJUQRM3HsV4kW1mA2T+6 TydgLFcZObftFF89Wji2UR7M3gAERQtNUeQdClXQMeU9/xDl03N7qRm3jrun9o1o Iwv7Fjg2TDQbR+vyUC4209rxtz6YIgauL3uWrimM6dW0f+L/WSj82DAA62bMgCTf 6wEeIQAqaq574/A5tWcSJMdPWbzrW+GIYoIdoDxoNPnHWS6gIz8ZusfCTnFP7BNg uyBpPviBd3XKvWju/041okwAH/L0sV7fNIO8g4QKgF0dlVYlB0w= =HoXs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2932613.0P3pStmDMi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1800249.u6MfGjpqfb>