From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 07:25:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5225B16A417 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ACF13C45D for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA9D20B1; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:25:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9F208A; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:25:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 622168444F; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:25:09 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Nathan Butcher References: <46C4FD44.1060105@fusiongol.com> <86odh6ikcf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <46C8F269.2030200@fusiongol.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:25:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <46C8F269.2030200@fusiongol.com> (Nathan Butcher's message of "Mon\, 20 Aug 2007 10\:46\:17 +0900") Message-ID: <86vebafz1m.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Promise SATA 300 TX4 cause X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:25:16 -0000 Nathan Butcher writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Once again, *no*. This commit may have exacerbated the problem, but > > people were having trouble with Promise controllers already in > > April. > I'm not going to argue with you. All I'm saying is that whatever > problems happened in April weren't there any longer in the 200706 > snapshot when the card was stable. These vm changes ruined that > somehow. It was not stable in any way, shape or form at any point from I started using ZFS in April until I ditched the Promise controller late last month. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no