From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 13:28:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0296D16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (mail-gw1.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CF743D1F for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:28:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i27LSIFE017943; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:28:18 GMT Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i27LSI5U024854; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:28:18 GMT (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost)i27LSHCZ024846; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:28:18 GMT (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:28:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Justin Dossey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040307212503.P13677@ury.york.ac.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load average with CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 21:28:24 -0000 On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Justin Dossey wrote: > Strangely, I'm seeing doubled load average numbers for my CURRENT > build. This machine runs seti@home, so it should show a LA around 1 > all the time. After upgrading from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-CURRENT, LA > doubled. Hmmm, I'm seeing similar to this as well. In my case, it's not doubled loadaverages, but load averages of one more than what it should be. So, with no processes running ny load average is 1, with one process running 100% my load average is 2, and with two running 100% the load average is three. Gavin