From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  1 01:44:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABB916A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Jul 2004 01:44:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4534B43D1D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Jul 2004 01:44:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B489872DF4; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B21FC72DB5; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
In-Reply-To: <48048559-CA69-11D8-8BDD-003065A70D30@shire.net>
Message-ID: <20040630184252.L66769@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net>
	<20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
	<48048559-CA69-11D8-8BDD-003065A70D30@shire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:44:54 -0000

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:

> Does -CURRENT actually have this in it now?  A while back the emulation
> stuff needed to run x86 binaries while in amd64 FreeBSD was not part of
> CURRENT and the comments were that it was too unstable...

I was told it works. Its possible there is some rtld wierdness still, but
static binaries should work.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org