From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 11:05:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39DD16A4CE; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8540343D5A; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i37I4euM058255; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:04:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:04:40 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Tadimeti Keshav Message-ID: <20040407180439.GD6715@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040407175143.26175.qmail@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040407175143.26175.qmail@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: camcontrol start vs load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:05:22 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 07), Tadimeti Keshav said: > HI, > Is the following sequence to mount a firewire Hard > disk correct? > a. camcontrol devlist -v > b. camcontrol start da0 (provided it is recognized) > c. mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 / > > Is this all needed to mount this HDD? > > secondly, should I use camcontrol start or camcontrol > load? "start" tells the drive to spin up, so if it's already running you don't need it. "load" is more for things like tape drives or CD-ROMs where you have a magazine or tray that can be loaded/ejected. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com