From owner-freebsd-afs  Thu Apr 29 18:30:45 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org
Received: from pilot006.cl.msu.edu (pilot006.cl.msu.edu [35.9.5.106])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C18C14C56
	for <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from zik@pilot.msu.edu)
Received: (from zik@localhost)
	by pilot006.cl.msu.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id VAA61400
	for "freebsd-afs@freebsd.org"; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:30:42 -0400
Message-Id: <199904300130.VAA61400@pilot006.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: a new beginning
To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Edward R Symanzik" <zik@pilot.msu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199904292137.RAA00355@cs.rpi.edu> from "David E. Cross" at Apr 29, 99 05:37:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> Given the availability of Arla, is there a reason we still want to port
> the Transarc AFS client?  

There is a chance Transarc would pick up support in the future if most of
the work was done.  A small chance, but a chance.  It is also more likely
to retain compatability as Transarc makes changes.

There is another issue here.  Several of us have seen Transarc's code.
This could taint the open-source status of Arla.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-afs" in the body of the message