From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 19 20:27:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019A3106566C;
	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from clemun@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.161.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A284B8FC15;
	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnp1 with SMTP id p1so6311201ggn.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:27:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=WpkI2bysQqPxK+VlEg5fFPO+FMRGGzbwcd/OpyIq/iA=;
	b=DyHwcZ6A01H8XJDDiVCt7HeFTaBaFTnEb7ER1rhFtCmyuOxNsqnVXkxu2G4dT+7Wjv
	K3V+T6oqp7q0Jj6i1/cMDrbe5645XX8GJnF2VVM9vTgqu8o8kKD4KoZmuO15qQUfhod0
	Hpen1W/eJ+oetgUbbYII5vhgudLnFZHQ1mRdU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.40.98 with SMTP id w2mr92203obk.36.1324324969957; Mon, 19
	Dec 2011 12:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.43.170 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:02:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3vbQNoiOYTRm9yqfY7WitViTo96mgU05Z=Fxk_wBfUGyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4EEF9375.1010203@sentex.net>
	<CAGMYy3vbQNoiOYTRm9yqfY7WitViTo96mgU05Z=Fxk_wBfUGyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:02:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKSJdABNs2smEjZxAyQpt_a-OPs1JCgR8v2X2rzh5OYVznBRng@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_Lecigne?= <clemun@gmail.com>
To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>,
	kib@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: logging _rtld errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:12 -0000

Hi,

2011/12/19 Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote:
>> Are there any security reasons as to why

Dont know but the ld_printerror != '\0' in the patch should be
*ld_printerror != '\0', no?

~clem