Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 02:15:18 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: 7-STABLE: bridge and em Message-ID: <72197513@bs1.sp34.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=98<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM> ether 00:0c:f1:6c:37:4c inet 192.168.16.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active tap0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:bd:3e:24:00:00 bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether ea:8b:1f:65:2a:5c id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: tap0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 7 priority 128 path cost 2000000 member: em0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 2000000 bs1% netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.16.254 UGS 0 357 em0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 3934 lo0 192.168.16.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 em0 192.168.16.1 00:07:e9:80:33:bc UHLW 1 16 em0 951 192.168.16.254 00:07:e9:80:33:bc UHLW 2 0 em0 1002 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#5 UHL lo0 ff01:5::/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 bs1% ping -c 3 192.168.16.254 PING 192.168.16.254 (192.168.16.254): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.16.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.316 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.16.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.263 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.16.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.266 ms --- 192.168.16.254 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.263/0.282/0.316/0.024 ms ----- But if I move ip address from em0 to bridge0: ----- bs1% sudo ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.16.30 netmask 0xffffff00 delete bs1% sudo ifconfig bridge0 inet 192.168.16.30 netmask 0xffffff00 bs1% sudo route add default 192.168.16.254 add net default: gateway 192.168.16.254 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=98<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM> ether 00:0c:f1:6c:37:4c media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active tap0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:bd:3e:24:00:00 bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether ea:8b:1f:65:2a:5c inet 192.168.16.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: tap0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 7 priority 128 path cost 2000000 member: em0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 2000000 bs1% netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.16.254 UGS 0 0 bridge 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 3934 lo0 192.168.16.0/24 link#6 UC 0 0 bridge 192.168.16.254 link#6 UHLW 2 0 bridge Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#5 UHL lo0 ff01:5::/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 bs1% ping -c 3 192.168.16.254 PING 192.168.16.254 (192.168.16.254): 56 data bytes --- 192.168.16.254 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss ----- Did I miss something? Thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72197513>