From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  4 05:43:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0254816A4CE
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 May 2005 05:43:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E58443D58
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 May 2005 05:43:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j445dC8A091211;
	Tue, 3 May 2005 23:39:13 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 23:40:04 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20050503.234004.34604268.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: kris@obsecurity.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050503232646.GA63062@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20050503223837.7d8c884f.thib@mi.is>
	<20050503232646.GA63062@xor.obsecurity.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cleanup and diffs ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 05:43:23 -0000

In message: <20050503232646.GA63062@xor.obsecurity.org>
            Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
: it.  This can be nontrivial.  Also, Dragonfly doesn't have to worry
: about any other architectures than i386, so it's possible that they
: haven't "really" fixed many of these warnings (i.e. they might still
: be there on a 64-bit platform).

Lord knows in the past how many tinderbox breakages we've had in the
tree because someone "fixed" all the warnings at level 6, but in fact
broke 64 bit ports...

Warner